SIETES :: 93212 citas

Resultados de la búsqueda por PRAGMÁTICO REFINAR BÚSQUEDA

1.

Iacobucci G. Sixty seconds on . . . the RECOVERY trial. BMJ 2020;369:20 de abril. [Ref.ID 103597]

2.

Alahdab F, Farah W, Almasri J, Barrionuevo P, Zaiem F, Benkhadra R, Asi N, Alsawas M, Pang Y, Ahmed AT, Rajjo T, Kanwar A, Benkhadra K, Razouki Z, Murad MH Wang Z. Treatment effect in earlier trials of patients with chronic medical conditions: a meta-epidemiologic study. Mayo Clin Proc 2018;93:marzo. [Ref.ID 102499]

3.

Little P, Moore M, Kelly J, Williamson I, Leydon G, McDermott L, Mullee M, Stuart B, on behalf of the PIPS investigators. Delayed antibiotic prescribing strategies for respiratory tract infections in primare care: pragmatic, factorial, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2014;348:g1606. [Ref.ID 97416]

4.

Little P, Moore M, Kelly J, Williamson I, Leydon G, McDermott L, Mullee M, Stuart B, on behalf of the PIPS investigators. Ibuprofen, paracetamol, and steam for patients with respiratory tract infections in primary care: pragmatic randomised factorial trial. BMJ 2014;348:f6041. [Ref.ID 97415]

5.

Karanicolas PJ, Montori VM, Schünemann HJ, Guyatt GH. "Pragmatic" clinical trials: from whose perspective?. Evidence Based Medicine 2009;14:130-1. [Ref.ID 86248]

6.

Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, Atlman DG, Tunis S, Haynes B, Oxman AD, Moher D. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ 2008;337:1223-6. [Ref.ID 84552]

7.

Perel P, Roberts I, Sena E, Wheble P, Briscoe C, Sandercock P, Macleod M, Mignini LE, Jayaram P, Khan KS. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 2007;334:197-200. [Ref.ID 79011]

8.

Hackam DG. Translating animal research into clinical benefit. BMJ 2007;334:163-4. [Ref.ID 79001]

9.

Rothwell PM. Funding for practice-oriented clinical research. Lancet 2006;368:262-6. [Ref.ID 77447]

10.

Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Hunt R, Williams H, Roder-Allen G, Rowett D, Shelby-James T, Esterman A, May F, Phillips PA. A pragmatic 2 x 2 x 2 factorial cluster randomized controlled trial of educational outreach visitint and case conferencing in palliative care - methodology of the Palliative Care Trial [ISRCTN 81117481]. Contemp Clin Trials 2006;27:83-100. [Ref.ID 75773]

11.

Vallvé C. Revisión crítica del ensayo clínico pragmático. Med Clin (Barc) 2003;121:384-8. [Ref.ID 67577]

12.

Davis J. A new type of "pragmatic" clinical trial. Scrip 2003;2888:2. [Ref.ID 67515]

13.

Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials. Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003;290:1624-32. [Ref.ID 67503]

14.

Thompson SG, Barber JA. How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?. BMJ 2000;320:1197-200. [Ref.ID 50672]

15.

Vickers AJ, de Craen AJM. Why use placebos in clinical trials? A narrative review of the methodological literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:157-61. [Ref.ID 49735]

16.

Armitage P. Attitudes in clinical trials. Stat Med 1998;17:2675-83. [Ref.ID 41911]

17.

Roland M, Torgerson DJ. Understanding controlled trials: what are pragmatic trials?. BMJ 1998;316:285. [Ref.ID 36554]

18.

Baigent C. The need for large-scale randomized evidence. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997;43:349-53. [Ref.ID 31993]

19.

Ellenberg JH. Intent-to-treat analysis versus as-treated analysis. Drug Inf J 1996;30:535-44. [Ref.ID 29931]

20.

Rovelli F, Tognoni G. The health service as a laboratory. Lancet 1996;348:169-70. [Ref.ID 28672]