Sistema de Información Esencial en Terapéutica y Salud

@SIETES7

Última actualización: 25/2/2021
SIETES contiene 93212 citas

 
 
 1 a 20 de 26 siguiente >>
Presentar resultados
Seleccionar todas
1. Cita con resumen
Iacobucci G. Sixty seconds on . . . the RECOVERY trial. BMJ 2020;369:20 de abril. [Ref.ID 103597]
2. Cita con resumen
Alahdab F, Farah W, Almasri J, Barrionuevo P, Zaiem F, Benkhadra R, Asi N, Alsawas M, Pang Y, Ahmed AT, Rajjo T, Kanwar A, Benkhadra K, Razouki Z, Murad MH Wang Z. Treatment effect in earlier trials of patients with chronic medical conditions: a meta-epidemiologic study. Mayo Clin Proc 2018;93:marzo. [Ref.ID 102499]
3.
Little P, Moore M, Kelly J, Williamson I, Leydon G, McDermott L, Mullee M, Stuart B, on behalf of the PIPS investigators. Delayed antibiotic prescribing strategies for respiratory tract infections in primare care: pragmatic, factorial, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2014;348:g1606. [Ref.ID 97416]
4. Cita con resumen
Little P, Moore M, Kelly J, Williamson I, Leydon G, McDermott L, Mullee M, Stuart B, on behalf of the PIPS investigators. Ibuprofen, paracetamol, and steam for patients with respiratory tract infections in primary care: pragmatic randomised factorial trial. BMJ 2014;348:f6041. [Ref.ID 97415]
5. Cita con resumen
Karanicolas PJ, Montori VM, Schünemann HJ, Guyatt GH. "Pragmatic" clinical trials: from whose perspective?. Evidence Based Medicine 2009;14:130-1. [Ref.ID 86248]
6.Tiene citas relacionadas Cita con resumen
Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, Atlman DG, Tunis S, Haynes B, Oxman AD, Moher D. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ 2008;337:1223-6. [Ref.ID 84552]
7.Tiene citas relacionadas Cita con resumen
Perel P, Roberts I, Sena E, Wheble P, Briscoe C, Sandercock P, Macleod M, Mignini LE, Jayaram P, Khan KS. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 2007;334:197-200. [Ref.ID 79011]
8.Tiene citas relacionadas Cita con resumen
Hackam DG. Translating animal research into clinical benefit. BMJ 2007;334:163-4. [Ref.ID 79001]
9. Cita con resumen
Rothwell PM. Funding for practice-oriented clinical research. Lancet 2006;368:262-6. [Ref.ID 77447]
10.
Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Hunt R, Williams H, Roder-Allen G, Rowett D, Shelby-James T, Esterman A, May F, Phillips PA. A pragmatic 2 x 2 x 2 factorial cluster randomized controlled trial of educational outreach visitint and case conferencing in palliative care - methodology of the Palliative Care Trial [ISRCTN 81117481]. Contemp Clin Trials 2006;27:83-100. [Ref.ID 75773]
11. Cita con resumen
Vallvé C. Revisión crítica del ensayo clínico pragmático. Med Clin (Barc) 2003;121:384-8. [Ref.ID 67577]
12. Cita con resumen
Davis J. A new type of "pragmatic" clinical trial. Scrip 2003;2888:2. [Ref.ID 67515]
14. Cita con resumen
Thompson SG, Barber JA. How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?. BMJ 2000;320:1197-200. [Ref.ID 50672]
15. Cita con resumen
Vickers AJ, de Craen AJM. Why use placebos in clinical trials? A narrative review of the methodological literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:157-61. [Ref.ID 49735]
16.
Armitage P. Attitudes in clinical trials. Stat Med 1998;17:2675-83. [Ref.ID 41911]
17.
Roland M, Torgerson DJ. Understanding controlled trials: what are pragmatic trials?. BMJ 1998;316:285. [Ref.ID 36554]
18.
Baigent C. The need for large-scale randomized evidence. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997;43:349-53. [Ref.ID 31993]
19.
Ellenberg JH. Intent-to-treat analysis versus as-treated analysis. Drug Inf J 1996;30:535-44. [Ref.ID 29931]
20. Cita con resumen
Rovelli F, Tognoni G. The health service as a laboratory. Lancet 1996;348:169-70. [Ref.ID 28672]
Seleccionar todas
 
 1 a 20 de 26 siguiente >>